Comments on science and social responsibility: A role for philosophy of science?

Philosophy of Science 64 (4):179 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Each of the three papers offers a different model for the role philosophers of science might play in consideration of the relations of science to society. These comments address common themes in the three papers, articulate further questions for each, and suggest some historical shifts that require different forms of philosophical engagement now than in the early part of the century

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Continental Philosophy of Science.Babette Babich - 2007 - In Constantin Boundas (ed.), The Edinburgh Companion to the Twentieth Century Philosophies. Edinburgh. University of Edinburgh Press. pp. 545--558.
Realism, philosophy and social science.Kathryn Dean (ed.) - 2006 - New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Is the History of Science Relevant to the Philosophy of Science?Marga Vicedo - 1992 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:490 - 496.
Why Cognitive Science Needs Philosophy and Vice Versa.Paul Thagard - 2009 - Topics in Cognitive Science 1 (2):237-254.
Comments on Suppes' Paper: The Essential but Implicit Role of Modal Concepts in Science.Aldo Bressan - 1972 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1972:315 - 321.
Co-responsibility for research integrity.Carl Mitcham - 2003 - Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (2):273-290.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
71 (#209,992)

6 months
4 (#320,252)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?