Undue Inducements and Reasonable Risks: Will the Dismal Science Lead to Dismal Research Ethics?1

American Journal of Bioethics 5 (5):29-32 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,592

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The new dismal science?Andy Higgins - 2006 - The Philosophers' Magazine 35:40-43.
Survey article: Feminism in the dismal science.Gabrielle Meagher & Julie A. Nelson - 2004 - Journal of Political Philosophy 12 (1):102–126.
Limits to research risks.F. G. Miller & S. Jofe - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (7):445-449.
The new dismal science?Andy Higgins - 2006 - The Philosophers' Magazine 35 (35):40-43.
The Dismal Preacher.R. H. U. Bloor - 1918 - Hibbert Journal 17:304.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-22

Downloads
11 (#1,130,421)

6 months
6 (#509,139)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alex John London
Carnegie Mellon University

Citations of this work

Ethics of Buying DNA.Julian J. Koplin, Jack Skeggs & Christopher Gyngell - 2022 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 19 (3):395-406.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Rationality and Freedom.Amartya Sen - 2005 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 67 (1):182-183.
Undue Inducement: Nonsense on Stilts?Ezekiel J. Emanuel - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (5):9-13.
Ethics in human subjects research: Do incentives matter?Ruth W. Grant & Jeremy Sugarman - 2004 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (6):717 – 738.

View all 6 references / Add more references