Comments on Kenneth P. Winkler’s “Signification, Intention, Projection”

Philosophia 37 (3):503-505 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

These are my comments on Ken Winkler's account of Locke's philosophy of language.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/s11406-008-9151-7

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Signification, intention, projection.Kenneth P. Winkler - 2009 - Philosophia 37 (3):477-501.
P.j.E. Kail's projection and realism in Hume's philosophy. [REVIEW]Kenneth P. Winkler - 2010 - Philosophical Books 51 (3):144-159.
Early Modern Intentionalism: Replies to LoLordo’s Comments.Kenneth P. Winkler - 2009 - Philosophia 37 (3):507-509.
Comments on Michael Jacovides “how Berkeley corrupted his capacity to conceive”.Jennifer Smalligan Marusic - 2009 - Philosophia 37 (3):431-436.
Pragmatics in Peter John Olivi’s Account of Signification of Common Names.Ana María Mora-Márquez - 2011 - Vivarium 49 (1-3):150-164.
The new Hume.Kenneth P. Winkler - 1991 - Philosophical Review 100 (4):541-579.
“All Is Revolution in Us”: Personal Identity in Shaftesbury and Hume.Kenneth P. Winkler - 2000 - Hume Studies 26 (1):3-40.
Berkeley. [REVIEW]Kenneth P. Winkler - 1992 - Idealistic Studies 22 (3):300-301.
Scepticism and anti-realism.Kenneth P. Winkler - 1985 - Mind 94 (373):36-52.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
79 (#207,989)

6 months
9 (#294,961)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references