Theories of Science

Philosophy 4 (16):504- (1929)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I noted two directions in which the scientific worker is seeking to advance. He is trying to give a more complete account of the actual detail of what is happening, and he is seeking wider and wider generalizations. As an observer, he must note what he observes, and, it would seem, omit nothing. But in seeking generalizations he must select, from among the features he observes, only those which he takes to be of general significance. Thence arises at least the appearance of a conflict in his activities. If he is too intent on the details of what he observes, his generalizations suffer; but if he leaves aside details too readily, his generalizations suffer equally. There is danger both in omitting and in not omitting

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,475

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On global theories.C. A. Hooker - 1975 - Philosophy of Science 42 (2):152-179.
Unified Theories and Unified Science.Robert L. Causey - 1974 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1974:3 - 13.
Choosing between confirmation theories.R. G. Swinburne - 1970 - Philosophy of Science 37 (4):602-613.
Background theories and total science.P. D. Magnus - 2005 - Philosophy of Science 72 (5):1064-1075.
The truth of science: physical theories and reality.Roger G. Newton - 1997 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Realism and the aim of science.Karl R. Popper - 1983 - New York: Routledge. Edited by William Warren Bartley.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
6 (#1,451,665)

6 months
3 (#974,323)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references