The Epistemological Relevance of Conceptual Change

Grazer Philosophische Studien 99 (3):449-473 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to show that the customary understanding of epistemic progress as a kind of belief change is incomplete and that conceptual change has to be acknowledged as a crucial driving force in epistemic progress. The author’s argument for the epistemological relevance of conceptual change proceeds as follows. First, he develops an account of conceptual change that clearly distinguishes conceptual change from belief change. He then takes a closer look at two kinds of conceptual change that are of special interest from an epistemological point of view. He calls them “disclosing” conceptual change and “revisionary” conceptual change. He then shows that the idea of epistemic value that demarcates the realm of epistemological inquiry applies to concepts and conceptual change.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,503

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

An Epistemological Study of Theory Change.Theofanis Aravanis - 2022 - Bulletin of the Section of Logic 51 (1):1-26.
Presuming placeholders are relevant enables conceptual change.Christophe Heintz - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (3):131-132.
Conceptual change and conceptual engineering: the case of colour concepts.Lieven Decock - 2021 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 64 (1-2):168-185.
On the Standards of Conceptual Change.Jari Kaukua & Vili Lähteenmäki - 2019 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 14 (2):183-204.
Interest, epistemological belief, and intentional conceptual change.T. Andre & M. Windschitl - 2003 - In Gale M. Sinatra & Paul R. Pintrich (eds.), Intentional Conceptual Change. L. Erlbaum. pp. 173--197.
How relevant is African philosophy in Africa? A conversation with Oladele Balogun.Chukwueloka S. Uduagwu - 2019 - Filosofia Theoretica: Journal of African Philosophy, Culture and Religions 8 (2):27-36.
On Why and How Intention Matters.Heidi M. Giebel - 2015 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 89 (3):369-395.
Notes toward an analysis of conceptual change.Mark Bevir - 2003 - Social Epistemology 17 (1):55 – 63.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-01-05

Downloads
30 (#528,361)

6 months
17 (#145,386)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Naming and Necessity.Saul Kripke - 1980 - Philosophy 56 (217):431-433.
On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme.Donald Davidson - 1973 - Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 47:5-20.
Two distinctions in goodness.Christine M. Korsgaard - 1983 - Philosophical Review 92 (2):169-195.
Considered Judgment.Catherine Z. Elgin - 1999 - Princeton University Press.

View all 32 references / Add more references