Journal of Moral Philosophy 9 (1):55-74 (2012)

Fundamentally, intentions do not matter to the permissibility of actions, according to Thomas Scanlon (among others). Yet, discriminatory intentions seem essential to certain kinds of direct discrimination in hiring and firing, and appear to be something by virtue of which, in part at least, these kinds of discrimination are morally impermissible. Scanlon's account of the wrongness of discrimination attempts to accommodate this appearance through the notion of the expressive meaning of discriminatory acts and a certain view about how permissibility relates to the meaning of actions. This paper explores the scope, strengths and weaknesses of this account. Specifically, it challenges the view that discrimination reflecting hierarchical value judgments necessarily involves a wrong that renders such discrimination more objectionable than other forms
Keywords Scanlon   Discrimination   meritocracy   intentions   moral permissibility   racism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1163/174552411X612065
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,379
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Reaction Qualifications Revisited.Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2009 - Social Theory and Practice 35 (3):413-439.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Should the Best Qualified Be Appointed?Shlomi Segall - 2012 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 9 (1):31-54.
The Injustice of Discrimination.Carl Knight - 2013 - South African Journal of Philosophy 32 (1):47-59.
Making Sense of Discrimination.Re'em Segev - 2014 - Ratio Juris 27 (1):47-78.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Equality and Non-Discrimination in Hiring - Introduction.Axel Gosseries - 2012 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 9 (1):3-7.
Discrimination : Discrimination : What is It and What Makes It Morally Wrong?Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2007 - In Jesper Ryberg, Thomas S. Petersen & Clark Wolf (eds.), New Waves in Applied Ethics. Palgrave-Macmillan.
Should the Best Qualified Be Appointed?Shlomi Segall - 2012 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 9 (1):31-54.
Why Not Regulate Private Discrimination?Matt Zwolinski - 2006 - San Diego Law Review 43 (Fall):1043.
Scanlon on Permissibility and Double Effect.Jakob Elster - 2012 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 9 (1):75-102.
Exploring the Concept of Genetic Discrimination.Margaret Otlowski - 2005 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 2 (3):165-176.
The Ethics of Price Discrimination.Juan M. Elegido - 2011 - Business Ethics Quarterly 21 (4):633-660.
Genetic Nondiscrimination and Health Care as an Entitlement.B. M. Kious - 2010 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (2):86-100.


Added to PP index

Total views
218 ( #53,019 of 2,519,667 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #166,923 of 2,519,667 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes