“… But I Could Never Have One”: The Abortion Intuition and Moral Luck

Hypatia 24 (1):41 - 55 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Starting from the intuition, shared by many women, that the legal right to an abortion must be defended but that they themselves could never undergo one, I offer an account of why pregnancy is morally valuable and why, nevertheless, it is often permissible to end one. Developing the idea that human pregnancy centrally involves the activity of calling a fetus into personhood, I argue that the permissibility of stopping this activity hinges on the goodness or badness of one's moral luck

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,881

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Animality and Agency: A Kantian Approach to Abortion.Lara Denis - 2008 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76 (1):117-37.
Moral Luck Defended.Nathan Hanna - 2014 - Noûs 48 (4):683-698.
Moral luck and the law.David Enoch - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (1):42-54.
Epistemological contextualism and the problem of moral luck.Berit Brogaard - 2003 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 84 (4):351–370.
Moral and epistemic luck.Duncan Pritchard - 2005 - Metaphilosophy 37 (1):1–25.
Moral and Epistemic Luck.Andrew Latus - 2000 - Journal of Philosophical Research 25:149-172.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-09-29

Downloads
41 (#388,230)

6 months
7 (#430,488)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

Moral Luck.B. A. O. Williams & T. Nagel - 1976 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 50:115 - 151.
Postures of the Mind: Essays on Mind and Morals.Don Locke & Annette Baier - 1981 - Philosophical Quarterly 36 (145):571.
Moral Contexts.Margaret Urban Walker - 2004 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

View all 14 references / Add more references