Self-Efficacy: Now You See It, Now You Don’t. Reply to Snoek

Neuroethics 10 (1):195-197 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Snoek, like other commentators, conflates some of my neural claims with those of the Brain Disease Model of Addiction. But she sees other details of my modeling with precision and depth. I welcome her emphasis on individual and developmental differences in addicts' capacity to recognize and deploy their personal agency. In fact we agree that belief in personal agency is a critical first step to cultivating it. Yet I wish to steer away from the disease nomenclature, to give that belief its best chance to flourish.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,628

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Addiction is not a brain disease (and it matters).Neil Levy - 2013 - Frontiers in Psychiatry 4 (24):1--7.
Theory of the snoek effect in ternary b.c.c. alloys.M. Koiwa - 1971 - Philosophical Magazine 24 (187):81-106.
Theory of the snoek effect in ternary b.c.c. alloys.M. Koiwa - 1971 - Philosophical Magazine 24 (189):539-554.
Theory of the snoek effect in ternary B.C.C. alloys.M. Koiwa - 1971 - Philosophical Magazine 24 (190):799-814.
Theory of the snoek effect in ternary b.c.c. alloys.M. Koiwa - 1971 - Philosophical Magazine 24 (187):107-122.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-05-04

Downloads
17 (#863,882)

6 months
4 (#775,606)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references