A mature second-person neuroscience needs a first-person (plural) developmental foundation

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (4):428-429 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Schilbach et al.'s model assumes that the ability to minds is already present in human infants and therefore falls foul of the very intellectualist problems it attempts to avoid. We propose an alternative relational, action-based account, which attempts to grasp how the individual's construction of knowledge develops within interactions

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Merging second-person and first-person neuroscience.Matthew R. Longo & Manos Tsakiris - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (4):429-430.
Social perception and “spectator theories” of other minds.Søren Overgaard & Joel Krueger - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (4):434 - 435.
Why not the first-person plural in social cognition?Mattia Gallotti - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (4):422-423.
Why Not the First-Person Plural in Social Cognition?Mattia Gallotti - 2013 - Behavioural and Brain Sciences 36 (4):422-423.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
24 (#678,992)

6 months
9 (#355,272)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?