Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (4):429-430 (2013)

Authors
Abstract
Schilbach et al. contrast second-person and third-person approaches to social neuroscience. We discuss relations between second-person and first-person approaches, arguing that they cannot be studied in isolation. Contingency is central for converging first- and second-person approaches. Studies of embodiment show how contingencies scaffold first-person perspective and how the transition from a third- to a second-person perspective fundamentally involves first-person contributions
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0140525x12001975
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,337
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Neuroscience, the Person, and God: An Emergentist Account.Philip Clayton - 1999 - In Zygon. Notre Dame: University Notre Dame Press. pp. 613-652.
The Second-Person Perspective.Michael Pauen - 2012 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 55 (1):33 - 49.
Being a Person and Acting as a Person.Grzegorz Hołub - 2008 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 13 (2):267-282.
Personal Perspectives.John J. Drummond - 2007 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 45 (S1):28-44.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-12-13

Total views
23 ( #493,065 of 2,507,886 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,715 of 2,507,886 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes