A Morass of Musings on Moralization. Reply to Frank and Nagel

Neuroethics 10 (1):141-142 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Frank and Nagel are very interested in the causes and consequences of moralizing about addiction. If addiction is a disease, moralistic concerns are sidelined. If it's a choice, we'd better identify clear reasons to absolve addicts from blame. While these are interesting considerations, they don't have much to do with the model of addiction I put forward in the target article.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Disease, Addiction and the Freedom to Resist.Piers Benn - 2007 - Philosophical Papers 36 (3):465-481.
Higher gap morasses, IA: Gap-two morasses and condensation.Charles Morgan - 1998 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 63 (3):753-787.
Nagelian Reduction Beyond the Nagel Model.Raphael van Riel - 2011 - Philosophy of Science 78 (3):353-375.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-05-10

Downloads
41 (#386,500)

6 months
14 (#176,451)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?