“There is no evidence to suggest …”: Changing The Way We Judge Information For Disclosure in the Informed Consent Process

Hypatia 12 (2):165 - 184 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Feminist health activists and medical researchers frequently disagree on the adequacy of the informed consent processes in clinical trials. I argue for an informed consent process that reflects the central importance of patient-participant autonomy. Such a standard may raise concerns for medical researchers about their capacity to control the quantity and quality of the information they disclose to potential participants. These difficulties might be addressed by presenting potential participants with differently sized disclosure packages



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,549

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Phase 1 oncology trials and informed consent.Franklin G. Miller & Steven Joffe - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (12):761-764.
Informed consent to HIV cure research.Danielle Bromwich & Joseph R. Millum - 2017 - Journal of Medical Ethics 43 (2):108-113.
Consent Obtained by Residents: Informed by the Uninformed?Alan R. Tait - 2019 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 30 (2):163-166.


Added to PP

66 (#243,123)

6 months
4 (#1,052,953)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Principles of biomedical ethics.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1979 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by James F. Childress.
Social philosophy.Joel Feinberg - 1973 - Englewood Cliffs, N.J.,: Prentice-Hall.
Medical experimentation: personal integrity and social policy.Charles Fried - 2016 - New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Edited by Franklin G. Miller & Alan Wertheimer.
Social Philosophy.Stephen Pink & Joel Feinberg - 1975 - Philosophical Review 84 (2):306.

View all 13 references / Add more references