Procedural misconceptions and informed consent: Insights from empirical research on the clinical trials industry

Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 16 (3):251-268 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

: This paper provides a simultaneously reflexive and analytical framework to think about obstacles to truly informed consent in social science and biomedical research. To do so, it argues that informed consent often goes awry due to procedural misconceptions built into the research context. The concept of procedural misconception is introduced to describe how individuals respond to what is familiar in research settings and overlook what is different. In the context of biomedical research, procedural misconceptions can be seen to function as root causes of therapeutic misconceptions

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Must research participants understand randomization?David Wendler - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (2):3 – 8.
Informed consent: a primer for clinical practice.Deborah Bowman - 2012 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by John Spicer & Rehana Iqbal.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
47 (#330,788)

6 months
2 (#1,232,442)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?