Scientific Philosophy, Mathematical Philosophy, and All That

Metaphilosophy 44 (3):267-275 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article suggests that scientific philosophy, especially mathematical philosophy, might be one important way of doing philosophy in the future. Along the way, the article distinguishes between different types of scientific philosophy; it mentions some of the scientific methods that can serve philosophers; it aims to undermine some worries about mathematical philosophy; and it tries to make clear why in certain cases the application of mathematical methods is necessary for philosophical progress

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What Are Mathematical Coincidences ?M. Lange - 2010 - Mind 119 (474):307-340.
Platonism and anti‐Platonism: Why worry?Mary Leng - 2005 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 19 (1):65 – 84.
Mathematical Modeling in Biology: Philosophy and Pragmatics.Rasmus Grønfeldt Winther - 2012 - Frontiers in Plant Evolution and Development 2012:1-3.
Against Mathematical Explanation.Mark Zelcer - 2013 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 44 (1):173-192.
Mathematical nominalism and measurement.Davide Rizza - 2010 - Philosophia Mathematica 18 (1):53-73.
What Makes a Scientific Explanation Distinctively Mathematical?Marc Lange - 2013 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64 (3):485-511.
Mathematical Idealization.Chris Pincock - 2007 - Philosophy of Science 74 (5):957-967.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-04-04

Downloads
196 (#101,122)

6 months
24 (#116,278)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Hannes Leitgeb
Ludwig Maximilians Universität, München

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references