The Natural and the Artefactual: The Implications of Deep Science and Deep Technology for Environmental Philosophy

Lexington Books (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Independent philosopher Lee (recently of the U. of Manchester) attends to the deeper implications of ecologically insensitive technology beyond its polluting effects. Contrasting modern with premodern worldviews provides the context for exploring how new sciences like biotechnology require an expanded environmental ethos encompassing both the biotic and the abiotic. The author considers misconceived the notions of nature as either a work of art or a mere social construct per some postmodern thinking. Annotation copyrighted by Book News, Inc., Portland, OR.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Deep Technology Environmental Ethics: An Alternative to Deep Ecology.Ralph Joseph Argen - 1994 - Dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo
The neo-stoicism of radical environmentalism.Jim Cheney - 1989 - Environmental Ethics 11 (4):293-325.
The Misbegotten Child of Deep Ecology.Stephen Avery - 2004 - Environmental Values 13 (1):31-50.
Deep Anthropology.Alan E. Wittbecker - 1986 - Environmental Ethics 8 (3):261-270.
The deep, long-range ecology movement: 1960-2000--a review.Bill Devall - 2001 - Ethics and the Environment 6 (1):18-41.
Naess's deep ecology approach and environmental policy.Harold Glasser - 1996 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 39 (2):157 – 187.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-02

Downloads
19 (#799,238)

6 months
9 (#308,593)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Keekok Lee
University of Manchester

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references