Justice, Non-Violence, and the Practice of Political Judgment: A Study of Ricoeur's Conception of Justice

Dissertation, University of Georgia (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In his recent works, Paul Ricoeur devotes considerable attention to the importance of John Rawls's political philosophy. At the same time, he develops his own positive account of justice, which concerns the moral foundation for society as well individual actions and decisions. Ricoeur is in substantial agreement that one of the main problems in a democratic society is securing the moral validity of public norms or principles. In addressing this problem, Ricoeur finds that Rawls's procedural conception of justice is extremely helpful, but limited in a fundamental way. ;The aim of this study is twofold: the first aim is to explore Paul Ricoeur's critique of John Rawls's pure procedural conception of justice. The second aim is to show that Ricoeur's conception of justice is a suitable alternative to Rawls's conception. It is not my intention here to compare Ricoeur's position to Rawls's in a complete fashion. But it will be my thesis that Ricoeur's conception of justice is preferable to that of Rawls in several important respects. Most importantly, Ricoeur's conception of justice is more realistic, since its justification does not require an appeal to a hypothetical original position. And second, his conception is more practically applicable, since its realization is more plausibly grounded in an anthropological account of human action and because of its emphasis on the dynamism of justice, which connects philosophy to politics and history. ;My study will proceed in two main parts. The first part, including the first and second chapters, deals with Rawls's theory of justice. The second, which includes the remaining chapters, discusses Paul Ricoeur's own positive account of justice. More specifically, I shall draw attentions to two crucial themes in Ricoeur's political thought: first, consideration of justice enables us to explain how morality plays an important role in social or political life, and also to explain the proper function of politics and history. Secondly, consideration of justice will show that Ricoeur's overall conception of justice is rooted in an appropriate understanding of human capabilities.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ricoeur, Rawls, and Capability Justice.Bernard P. Dauenhauer - 2011 - Études Ricoeuriennes / Ricoeur Studies 2 (2):176-178.
Justice: Metaphysical, After All? [REVIEW]Ryan W. Davis - 2011 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (2):207-222.
Distributive Justice.Charles Fried - 1983 - Social Philosophy and Policy 1 (1):45.
The coherence of Rawls's plea for democratic equality.Percy B. Lehning - 1998 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 1 (4):1-41.
The Philosophical Interest of Rawls' Theory of Justice.Edward Alan Papa - 1983 - Dissertation, State University of New York at Stony Brook
Rawls and Natural Justice.Dong Jin Jang - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 29:31-43.
Taking the distinction between persons seriously.Anthony Laden - 2004 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 1 (3):277-292.
Rawls and Natural Justice.Dong Jin Jang - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 29:31-43.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-02

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references