The Philosophical Interest of Rawls' Theory of Justice

Dissertation, State University of New York at Stony Brook (1983)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Rawls' theory of justice shares the fundamental shortcomings of the utilitarian conception of justice which it seeks to replace. The aim of this dissertation is, first, to provide a comprehensive reading of Rawls' theory which exhibits its internal structure and, second, to make explicit both the theory's lack of coherence and the undesirable, yet unavoidable, implications for the conceptions of person and society which follow from its central assumptions. ;The exposition of Rawls' theory is divided into two parts. Part one treats Rawls' social and political philosophy. I show how Rawls' original position is best understood as a perspective on justice arrived at by varying the utilitarian point of view in response to criticisms of its moral relevance. Part two analyzes the role which Rawls establishes for moral theory in resolving the traditional philosophical problems of the meaning of moral language and the nature of moral truth. Rawls construes moral theory as an inquiry designed to describe the structure of our shared moral conception, I examine the manner and extent to which descriptive moral theory can answer the traditional problems of moral philosophy, the nature of the moral point of view on Rawls' account, and the broadly empirical constraints on method which Rawls' theory incorporates. ;To conclude, I focus the elements which bring the theory's shortcomings into relief, and I argue that Rawls' notion of a fully adequate moral theory is inconsistent with his own account of the nature of morality. I then show how Rawls' conception of justice implies that persons are fundamentally alienated from their plans of life and thus severs the unity of person. Finally, I show how Rawls' liberal conception of justice cannot overcome the conception of society which he attributes to utilitarianism and which he argues is inadequate for the purposes of understanding justice

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Rawls’ Avowed Error in Rational Contractarianism.Jung Soon Park - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 10:325-340.
John Rawls: His Life and Theory of Justice.Thomas Pogge - 2007 - New York, US: Oup Usa. Edited by Michelle Kosch.
Rawls’s Rejection of Preinstitutional Desert.Tea Logar - 2013 - Acta Analytica 28 (4):483-494.
Rawls and the Problem of Honour.Kevin W. Gray - 2012 - Philosophia 40 (2):213-222.
Liberalism, Political Pluralism, and International Justice.Hahn Hsu - 1998 - Dissertation, The Ohio State University
Rawlsian Justice.Fabienne Peter - 2009 - In Paul Anand, Prastanta Pattanaik & Clemens Puppe (eds.), Handbook of Rational and Social Choice. Oxford University Press. pp. 433--456.
Taking the distinction between persons seriously.Anthony Laden - 2004 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 1 (3):277-292.
Kantian Constructivism and Rawlsian Egalitarianism.Alan Roy Mattlage - 1993 - Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
The Justification of Political Liberalism.Daniel M. Weinstock - 1994 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 75 (3-4):165-185.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-02

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Edward Papa
Sacred Heart University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references