- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Science or superstition?
Cognition 1 (2-3):265-299 (1972)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Comments on Professor Layzer's 'science or superstition.R. J. Herrnstein - 1972 - Cognition 1 (4):419-421.
Naming elements after scientists: An account of a controversy. [REVIEW]Geoff Rayner-Canham & Zheng Zheng - 2007 - Foundations of Chemistry 10 (1):13-18.
The Nature of Physical Science and the Objectives of the Scientist.John J. Fitzgerald - 1952 - Philosophy 27 (101):125 - 137.
The Phenomenology of Superstition or a Phenomenological Superstition?Elena Ibáñez-Guerra - 2008 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 15 (3):251-254.
In Proceedings of the International Conference o “Is Science able to explain the Scientist? (Science abd Scientist-2013) being held at Synergy Institute of Technology, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India, on December 08, 2013. Covers Theme 1 : Science of Spiritual.Varanasi Ramabrahmam - 2013
An enquiry concerning human understanding.David Hume - 2000 - In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Exploring Philosophy: An Introductory Anthology. New York, NY, United States of America: Oxford University Press USA. pp. 112.
Some thoughts on "what the natural scientist needs from the social scientist".Paul S. Olmstead - 1948 - Philosophy of Science 15 (2):85-86.
Inventing Superstition: From the Hippocratics to the Christians.Dale B. Martin - 2004 - Harvard University Press.
The Scientist Qua Scientist Makes Value Judgments.Richard Rudner - 1953 - Philosophy of Science 20 (1):1-6.
The Seven Strategies of the Sophisticated Pseudo-Scientist: a look into Freud’s rhetorical tool box. [REVIEW]Athony A. Derksen - 2001 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 32 (2):329-350.
Philosophy, engineering, biology, and history: A vindication of Turing's views about the distinction between the cognitive and physical sciences.Justin Leiber - 2002 - Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 14 (1):29-37.
Sustaining a Controversy: The Non-classical Ion Debate.William Goodwin - 2013 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64 (4):787-816.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-20
Downloads
17 (#862,403)
6 months
4 (#779,041)
2014-01-20
Downloads
17 (#862,403)
6 months
4 (#779,041)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Difference mechanisms: Explaining variation with mechanisms.James Tabery - 2009 - Biology and Philosophy 24 (5):645-664.
R. A. Fisher, Lancelot Hogben, and the Origin of Genotype–Environment Interaction.James Tabery - 2008 - Journal of the History of Biology 41 (4):717-761.
‘Do not adjust your mind, there is a fault in reality’— ideology in neurobiology.Steven P. R. Rose & Hilary Rose - 1973 - Cognition 2 (4):479-502.
Making sense of the nature–nurture debate. [REVIEW]James Tabery - 2009 - Biology and Philosophy 24 (5):711-723.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-687984fc98-d9rrc uwo