Dissertation, University of Sydney (2019)

Andrew James Latham
Aarhus University
In this thesis, I will defend a new kind of compatibilist account of free action, indirect conscious control compatibilism (or indirect compatibilism for short), and argue that some of our actions are free according to it. My argument has three components, and involves the development of a brand new tool for experimental philosophy, and the use of cognitive neuroscience. The first component of the argument shows that compatibilism (of some kind) is a conceptual truth. Contrary to the current orthodoxy in the free will literature, which is that our concept of free will is an incompatibilist concept - a concept according to which we have free will only if determinism is false - I will show that our concept of free will is in fact a compatibilist concept - a concept according to which we can have free will even if determinism is true - and I do so using a new experimental philosophy methodology inspired by two-dimensional semantics. Of course, even if our concept of free will is a compatibilist concept, this does not mean that there are any free actions in the world: the current empirical evidence from the brain sciences appears to show that there might be no, or very few, free actions in the world, even on many compatibilist understandings of what it would take for there to be free will. The second component of the argument addresses this concern by extending our understanding of compatibilism. Agents act freely either when their actions are caused by compatibilistically acceptable psychological processes, or are indirectly caused by those same processes. Hence the name of my account: indirect compatibilism. The final component of the argument defends my new account against some interesting objections and provides evidence from cognitive neuroscience that some of our actions count as free by the lights of indirect compatibilism.
Keywords free action  free will  compatibilism  experimental philosophy  cognitive neuroscience
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Knowledge and its Limits.Timothy Williamson - 2000 - Oxford University Press.
Brainstorms.Daniel C. Dennett - 1978 - MIT Press.

View all 190 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Conceptual Impossibility of Free Will Error Theory.Andrew J. Latham - 2019 - European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 15 (2):99-120.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Is Hard Determinism a Form of Compatibilism?Jeremy Randel Koons - 2002 - Philosophical Forum 33 (1):81-99.
Liberdade E Vontade Em Locke.Marília Ferraz - 2009 - Filosofia Unisinos 10 (3):291-301.
Compatibilism and the Free Will Defense.Jason Turner - 2013 - Faith and Philosophy 30 (2):125-137.
Mitigating Soft Compatibilism.Justin A. Capes - 2013 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 87 (3):640-663.
The Contrariety of Compatibilist Positions.Saul Smilansky - 1991 - Journal of Philosophical Research 16:293-309.
Humean Compatibilism.Helen Beebee & Alfred Mele - 2002 - Mind 111 (442):201-223.


Added to PP index

Total views
299 ( #35,365 of 2,505,994 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
51 ( #16,789 of 2,505,994 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes