Tensions in setting health care priorities for South Africa's children

Journal of Medical Ethics 24 (4):268-273 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The new South African constitution commits the government to guarantee "basic health services" for every child under 18. Primary health care for pregnant women and children under six and elements of essential primary health care have received priority. At present, there is little analysis of the moral considerations involved in making choices about more advanced or costly health care which may, arguably, also be "basic". This paper illustrates some of the tensions in setting priorities for a just macro-allocation of children's health care, given the realities of need and scarce resources, and the commitment to equality of basic opportunities

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,764

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Health care for children: A community perspective.Daniel Callahan - 2001 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (2):137 – 146.
Children's rights to health care.Dan W. Brock - 2001 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (2):163 – 177.
Setting Priorities in the Spanish Health Care System.Q. Quintana & A. Infante - 1995 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (6):595-606.
On duties to provide basic health and dental care to children.Loretta M. Kopelman - 2001 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (2):193 – 209.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
58 (#245,318)

6 months
3 (#435,525)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lesley Dorothy Henley
University of Cape Town

References found in this work

Quality of life in health-care allocation.E. H. Morreim - 1995 - Encyclopedia of Bioethics 3:1358-61.
Minds and hearts.Philip J. Boyle & Daniel Callahan - 1993 - Hastings Center Report 23 (5):1-23.

Add more references