The Literal Intent of Berkeley's Dialogues

Philosophy and Literature 6 (1-2):165-171 (1982)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,075

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Malapropisms and Davidson's Theories of Literal Meaning.John Michael McGuire - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 6:93-97.
Berkeley and Irish philosophy.David Berman - 2005 - New York: Thoemmes Continuum.
Is Literal Meaning Conventional?Andrei Marmor - 2008 - Topoi 27 (1-2):101-113.
Taking desirelessness () seriously.Christopher G. Framarin - 2005 - Asian Philosophy 15 (2):143 – 155.
“It Says What It Says”.Lars Hertzberg - 2011 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 85 (4):589-603.
On defining truth.Frank Deaver - 1990 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 5 (3):168 – 177.
Berkeley's Philosophy of Religion.Kenneth L. Pearce - 2017 - In Richard Brook & Bertil Belfrage (eds.), The Bloomsbury Companion to Berkeley. London: Bloomsbury Academic. pp. 458-483.
Legislative Intent in Law's Empire.Richard Ekins - 2011 - Ratio Juris 24 (4):435-460.
Meaning, signification, and suggestion: Berkeley on general words.Timothy Pritchard - 2012 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 29 (3):301-317.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-02-23

Downloads
6 (#1,463,186)

6 months
1 (#1,474,534)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references