A Debate on God and Morality: What is the Best Account of Objective Moral Values and Duties? By William Lane Craig, Erik J. Wielenberg, and Adam Lloyd Johnson [Book Review]

Religious Studies 58 (3):659–663 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A review of William Lane Craig, Erik J. Wielenberg, and Adam Lloyd Johnson's "A Debate on God and Morality: What is the Best Account of Objective Moral Values and Duties?"

Similar books and articles

Wile E. Coyote and the Craggy Rocks Below.Tyler Dalton McNabb - 2018 - Philosophia Christi 20 (2):339-346.
Reply to Craig, Murphy, McNabb, and Johnson.Erik J. Wielenberg - 2018 - Philosophia Christi 20 (2):365-375.
Fortifying the Petard.Adam Lloyd Johnson - 2018 - Philosophia Christi 20 (2):357-363.
Craig on God and Morality.Thomas W. Smythe & Michael Rectenwald - 2011 - International Philosophical Quarterly 51 (3):331-338.
Debunking Nontheistic Moral Realism.Adam Lloyd Johnson - 2015 - Philosophia Christi 17 (2):353-367.
Erik Wielenberg’s Metaphysics of Morals.William Lane Craig - 2018 - Philosophia Christi 20 (2):333-338.
An Inconsistency in Craig’s Defence of the Moral Argument.Erik J. Wielenberg - 2012 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 4 (4):49--58.
God and the ontological foundation of morality.Wes Morriston - 2012 - Religious Studies 48 (1):15 - 34.
Craig, Anti-Platonism, and Objective Morality.R. Scott Smith - 2017 - Philosophia Christi 19 (2):331-343.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-25

Downloads
285 (#70,857)

6 months
177 (#17,311)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references