Public Health Protection vs. Freedom of Commercial Expression in the Commonwealth Caribbean: The Case of Barbados and Jamaica

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 50 (2):304-311 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter explores the tension between public health protection and the freedom of commercial expression from a Commonwealth Caribbean perspective, using Barbados and Jamaica as case studies. First, it assesses the scope of the right to freedom of expression. Second, it discusses the extent to which public health protection may be invoked to restrict the right. The authors conclude that Commonwealth Caribbean states can justifiably restrict commercial speech about tobacco products and unhealthy food and beverages.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,991

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

United States: Protecting Commercial Speech under the First Amendment.Jennifer L. Pomeranz - 2022 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 50 (2):265-275.
Freedom of expression in commerce.Kenton F. Machina - 1984 - Law and Philosophy 3 (3):375 - 406.
Freedom of Commercial Expression. [REVIEW]L. W. Sumner - 2005 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 35 (4):623-640.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-07-29

Downloads
12 (#1,113,725)

6 months
3 (#1,046,148)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references