Freedom of expression in commerce

Law and Philosophy 3 (3):375 - 406 (1984)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Does commercial speech deserve the same freedom from governmental interference as do noncommercial forms of expression? Examination of this question forces a reappraisal of the grounds upon which freedom of expression rests. I urge an analysis of those grounds which founds freedom of speech upon the requirements of individual autonomy over against society. I then apply the autonomy analysis to commercial expression by examining the empirical features which distinguish commercial forms of expression. Some such features - e.g., triviality — have been cited by others as justification for limiting the freedom accorded commercial speech, but I reject the power of those features to limit freedom of expression. Instead, I identify three features of commercial expression which are relevant to the task: resiliency (coupled with potential for abuse), action-orientation, and intimate connection with conventional commercial structures. I discuss the implications of these features for legitimizing governmental restriction of freedom in commercial expression, with the general conclusion that such restriction must be more severely limited than is commonly thought.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,369

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
37 (#434,525)

6 months
8 (#372,083)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Media Violence and Freedom of Speech: How to Use Empirical Data.Boudewijn Bruin - 2008 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 11 (5):493-505.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references