- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
For and Against Method: Including Lakatos's Lectures on Scientific Method and the Lakatos-Feyerabend Correspondence
Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Paul Feyerabend & Matteo Motterlini (1999)
Abstract
The work that helped to determine Paul Feyerabend's fame and notoriety, Against Method,stemmed from Imre Lakatos's challenge: "In 1970 Imre cornered me at a party. 'Paul,' he said, 'you have such strange ideas.Author's Profile
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
For and against Method: Including Lakatos's Lectures on Scientific Method and the Lakatos-Feyerabend Correspondence by Imre Lakatos; Paul Feyerabend; Matteo Motterlini. [REVIEW]Richard Brown - 2001 - Isis 92:643-643.
For and against Method: Including Lakatos's Lectures on Scientific Method and the Lakatos-Feyerabend Correspondence. Imre Lakatos, Paul Feyerabend, Matteo Motterlini. [REVIEW]Richard Brown - 2001 - Isis 92 (3):643-643.
Imre Lakatos and Paul Feyerabend for and against method: Including Lakatos's lectures on scientific method and the Lakatos–Feyerabend correspondence. [REVIEW]Brendan Larvor - 2000 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (4):919-922.
Review of Imre Lakatos, Paul Feyerabend and Matteo Motterlini: For and Against Method: Including Lakatos's Lectures on Scientific Method and the Lakatos-Feyerabend Correspondence. [REVIEW]Imre Lakatos, Paul Feyerabend & Brendan Larvor - 2000 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (4):919-922.
For and Against Method, including Lakatos' Lectures on Scientific Method, and the Lakatos-Feyerabend Correspondence. By Imre Lakatos and Paul Feyerabend. [REVIEW]J. Preston - 2002 - The European Legacy 7 (2):258-258.
Imre Lakatos and Paul Feyerabend, For and Against Method, ed. by Matteo Motterlini. [REVIEW]H. Chang - 2000 - Annals of Science 57:456-457.
Review. Matteo Motterlini (ed). Imre Lakatos. Paul K Feyerabend. Sull'orlo della scienza: pro e contro il metodo. (On the threshold of Science: for and against method). [REVIEW]Donald Gillies - 1996 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (3):476-478.
Imre Lakatos and Paul Feyerabend, For and Against Method Reviewed by.Mary Leng - 2000 - Philosophy in Review 20 (2):115-117.
Imre Lakatos and Paul Feyerabend, For and Against Method. [REVIEW]Mary Leng - 2000 - Philosophy in Review 20:115-117.
"Essays in Memory of Imre Lakatos," ed. Robert S. Cohen, Paul K. Feyerabend, and Marx W. Wartofsky. [REVIEW]Steven Bartlett - 1978 - Modern Schoolman 55 (3):292-294.
Analytics
Added to PP
2012-08-21
Downloads
125 (#143,697)
6 months
8 (#506,113)
2012-08-21
Downloads
125 (#143,697)
6 months
8 (#506,113)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Feyerabend and manufactured disagreement: reflections on expertise, consensus, and science policy.Jamie Shaw - 2020 - Synthese 198 (Suppl 25):6053-6084.
Why did Feyerabend Defend Astrology? Integrity, Virtue, and the Authority of Science.Ian James Kidd - 2016 - Social Epistemology 30 (4):464-482.
Reconsidering Feyerabend’s “Anarchism‘.Jonathan Y. Tsou - 2003 - Perspectives on Science 11 (2):208-235.
Creativity in Science and the ‘Anthropological Turn’ in Virtue Theory.Ian James Kidd - 2020 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 11 (1):1-16.
Feyerabend on Science and Education.Ian James Kidd - 2013 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 47 (3):407-422.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-2nz2h uwo