- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
For and Against Method: Including Lakatos's Lectures on Scientific Method and the Lakatos-Feyerabend Correspondence
Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Paul Feyerabend & Matteo Motterlini (1999)
Abstract
The work that helped to determine Paul Feyerabend's fame and notoriety, Against Method,stemmed from Imre Lakatos's challenge: "In 1970 Imre cornered me at a party. 'Paul,' he said, 'you have such strange ideas.Author's Profile
Reprint years
2000
Call number
Q175.3.L35 1999
ISBN(s)
0226467759 9780226467757 0226467740
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Imre Lakatos and Paul Feyerabend for and against method: Including Lakatos's lectures on scientific method and the Lakatos–Feyerabend correspondence. [REVIEW]Brendan Larvor - 2000 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (4):919-922.
Imre Lakatos i Paul Fayerabend czyli za i przeciw metodzie [recenzja] Paul K. Feyerabend, Ammazzando il tempo. Un'autobiografia, 1994. Imre Lakatos, Paul K. Feyerabend, Sull'orlo della scienza. Pro e contro il metodo, 1995. [REVIEW]Tadeusz Sierotowicz - 1996 - Zagadnienia Filozoficzne W Nauce 18.
Review. Matteo Motterlini (ed). Imre Lakatos. Paul K Feyerabend. Sull'orlo della scienza: pro e contro il metodo. (On the threshold of Science: for and against method). [REVIEW]Donald Gillies - 1996 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (3):476-478.
Chocolate and Chess (Unlocking Lakatos). [REVIEW]John Kadvany - 2010 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 42 (2):276-286.
From the method of proofs and refutations to the methodology of scientific research programmes.Gábor Forrai - 1993 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 7 (2):161-175.
An hungarian tragedy.Jerome R. Ravetz - 2004 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 47 (4):413 – 422.
The methodology of scientific research programmes.Imre Lakatos - 1978 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Popper, Kuhn, Lakatos, and Aim-Oriented Empiricism.Nicholas Maxwell - 2005 - Philosophia 32 (1-4):181-239.
Analytics
Added to PP
2012-08-21
Downloads
117 (#130,626)
6 months
7 (#141,216)
2012-08-21
Downloads
117 (#130,626)
6 months
7 (#141,216)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Feyerabend and manufactured disagreement: reflections on expertise, consensus, and science policy.Jamie Shaw - 2020 - Synthese 198 (Suppl 25):6053-6084.
Reconsidering Feyerabend’s “Anarchism‘.Jonathan Y. Tsou - 2003 - Perspectives on Science 11 (2):208-235.
Why did Feyerabend Defend Astrology? Integrity, Virtue, and the Authority of Science.Ian James Kidd - 2016 - Social Epistemology 30 (4):464-482.
How Can a Taxonomy of Stances Help Clarify Classical Debates on Scientific Change?Hakob Barseghyan & Jamie Shaw - 2017 - Philosophies 2 (4):24.
Feyerabend on Science and Education.Ian James Kidd - 2013 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 47 (3):407-422.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6b7fd944d-nlfbr N