Review of Imre Lakatos, Paul Feyerabend and Matteo Motterlini: For and Against Method: Including Lakatos's Lectures on Scientific Method and the Lakatos-Feyerabend Correspondence [Book Review]

, &
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (4):919-922 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/bjps/51.4.919

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Imre Lakatos and Paul Feyerabend for and against method: Including Lakatos's lectures on scientific method and the Lakatos–Feyerabend correspondence. [REVIEW]Brendan Larvor - 2000 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (4):919-922.
For and Against Method: Including Lakatos's Lectures on Scientific Method and the Lakatos-Feyerabend Correspondence.Imre Lakatos, Paul Feyerabend & Matteo Motterlini - 1999 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Paul Feyerabend & Matteo Motterlini.
For and Against Method, including Lakatos' Lectures on Scientific Method, and the Lakatos-Feyerabend Correspondence. By Imre Lakatos and Paul Feyerabend. [REVIEW]J. Preston - 2002 - The European Legacy 7 (2):258-258.
Brecht and Lukács as teachers of Feyerabend and Lakatos: the Feyerabend-Lakatos debate as scientific recapitulation of the Brecht- Lukács debate.Val Dusek - 1998 - History of the Human Sciences 11 (2):25-44.
Lakatos's Epistemic Aspirations.Jarret Leplin - 2001 - Theoria 16 (3):481-498.
Imre Lakatos i Paul Fayerabend czyli za i przeciw metodzie [recenzja] Paul K. Feyerabend, Ammazzando il tempo. Un'autobiografia, 1994. Imre Lakatos, Paul K. Feyerabend, Sull'orlo della scienza. Pro e contro il metodo, 1995. [REVIEW]Tadeusz Sierotowicz - 1996 - Zagadnienia Filozoficzne W Nauce 18.
Imre Lakatos and Paul Feyerabend, For and Against Method Reviewed by.Mary Leng - 2000 - Philosophy in Review 20 (2):115-117.
Imre Lakatos and Paul Feyerabend, For and Against Method, ed. by Matteo Motterlini. [REVIEW]H. Chang - 2000 - Annals of Science 57:456-457.
Lakatos as historian of mathematics.Brendan P. Larvor - 1997 - Philosophia Mathematica 5 (1):42-64.
On the critique of scientific reason.Paul K. Feyerabend - 1976 - In R. S. Cohen, P. K. Feyerabend & M. Wartofsky (eds.), Essays in Memory of Imre Lakatos. Reidel. pp. 109--143.
Review. Matteo Motterlini (ed). Imre Lakatos. Paul K Feyerabend. Sull'orlo della scienza: pro e contro il metodo. (On the threshold of Science: for and against method). [REVIEW]Donald Gillies - 1996 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (3):476-478.
The bid to transcend Popper, and the Lakatos-Polanyi connection.Stefania Ruzsits Jha - 2006 - Perspectives on Science 14 (3):318-346.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-20

Downloads
20 (#747,345)

6 months
5 (#629,136)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Brendan Larvor
University of Hertfordshire

Citations of this work

Creativity in Science and the ‘Anthropological Turn’ in Virtue Theory.Ian James Kidd - 2020 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 11 (1):1-16.
Fairness in Knowing: Science Communication and Epistemic Justice.Fabien Medvecky - 2018 - Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (5):1393-1408.
Paul Feyerabend on the scientific worldview: Towards questioning the scientific uniformity.N. I. Petrunok - 2014 - Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research 6:113-124.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references