Comment on John Foster

Analyse & Kritik 16 (2):150-152 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Modern environmental thought is characterized by a paradox. The value of environmental goods seems to transcend all purely human values. At the same time environmental goods have to be placed within an overall ranking if there is to be rational environmental policy. It is argued that J. Foster's concept of value-judgement cannot solve this paradox.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,590

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Hope, self-transcendence and environmental ethics.John Nolt - 2010 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 53 (2):162 – 182.
Anthropocentrism, Atomism, and Environmental Ethics.Donald Scherer - 1982 - Environmental Ethics 4 (2):115-123.
Anthropocentrism, Atomism, and Environmental Ethics.Donald Scherer - 1982 - Environmental Ethics 4 (2):115-123.
3. Inherent Value and Moral Standing in Environmental Change.Wendy Donner - 2018 - In . Cornell University Press. pp. 52-74.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-04-01

Downloads
34 (#123,329)

6 months
6 (#1,472,471)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references