Aesthetic consciousness of site-specific art

South African Journal of Philosophy 32 (4):349–353 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The aim of this article is to examine Edmund Husserl’s theory of aesthetic consciousness and the possibility to apply it to site-specific art. The central focus will be on the idea of the limited synthetic unity of the aesthetic object that is introduced by Husserl in order to differentiate positional and aesthetic attitude towards the object. I claim that strongly site-specific art, which is a work of art about a place and in the place, challenges the view that the synthetic unity of the aesthetic object is limited. Moreover, following Husserl’s theory, it becomes questionable whether strongly site-specific art is art at all. I try to answer these objections by explaining how the artist prescribes the appearances and boundaries of a strongly site-specific object of art, thereby satisfying the demand for the limitedness of the synthetic unity of the aesthetic object.

Similar books and articles

Dismantling the frame: Site-specific art and aesthetic autonomy.Jason Gaiger - 2009 - British Journal of Aesthetics 49 (1):43-58.
Remarks on aesthetic intentionality: Husserl or Kant.Danielle Lories - 2006 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 14 (1):31-49.
Looking for Beauty in the Brain.Ethan Weed - 2008 - Estetika: The European Journal of Aesthetics 45 (1):5-23.
Double-slit Interference and Temporal Topos.Goro Kato & Tsunefumi Tanaka - 2006 - Foundations of Physics 36 (11):1681-1700.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-07

Downloads
988 (#13,421)

6 months
104 (#40,892)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Regina-Nino Mion (née Kurg)
Estonian Academy of Arts

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations