Diametros 18 (69):1-19 (2020)

Authors
Tomasz Kupś
Nicolaus Copernicus University
Abstract
A shift away from exclusionary moral reductionism can be discerned in modern interpretations of Kant’s philosophy of religion. Consequently, at least since the 1970s, historical faith has been appreciated as a necessary and desirable element of Kant’s philosophy of religion. One of the reasons prompting Kant to include historical faith in his system of the philosophy of religion is what commentators on Kant’s philosophy call the ‘moral gap’ as there is a disproportion between the limited competence of man as a natural being and moral goals that seem unattainable. For the believer, the content of historical faith offers a real solution to the disproportion between his limitations as a natural being and the goals set for him by practical reason. For the believer, the ‘moral gap’ is not just a theoretical problem, but an existential challenge whose solution lies beyond his own limited competence. In this article, I consider whether historical faith can also provide a theoretical supplement to the picture of one’s own life. If so, then the content of historical faith may also prove important for the non-believer.
Keywords "deep structure"  "moral gap"  Immanuel Kant  ethics  historical faith  philosophy of religion  pure rational religion
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2021
DOI 10.33392/diam.1734
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,265
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Critique of Practical Reason.Immanuel Kant - 1788 - Hackett Publishing Company.
Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals.Immanuel Kant - 1785 - In Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Late Modern Philosophy: Essential Readings with Commentary. Blackwell.
Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals.Immanuel Kant - 1996 - In Practical Philosophy. Cambridge University Press. pp. 37-108.
Kant.Paul Guyer - 2006 - Routledge.

View all 38 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Comparative Study of Aquinas and Kant‘s Narration of Ethics and Theology.Mohammad Raayat Jahromi - 2017 - Journal of Philosophical Investigations at University of Tabriz 11 (21):205-215.
Religion and Rational Theology.Riccardo Pozzo - 1998 - Review of Metaphysics 52 (1):156-157.
The Paradox of Inwardness in Kant and Kierkegaard.Stephen R. Palmquist - 2016 - Journal of Religious Ethics 44 (4):738-751.
Saving Faith From Kant’s Remarkable Antimony.Phillip L. Quinn - 1990 - Faith and Philosophy 7 (4):418-433.
Kant and Religion.Allen Wood - 2020 - Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-09-30

Total views
3 ( #1,358,347 of 2,507,708 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,820 of 2,507,708 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes