Problem zawiści w kontekście zasad sprawiedliwości i Rawlsowskiej konstrukcji sytuacji początkowej

Przeglad Filozoficzny - Nowa Seria:259-273 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.24425/pfns.2021.138986

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,475

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Envy, facts and justice: A critique of the treatment of envy in justice as fairness.Patrick Tomlin - 2008 - Res Publica 14 (2):101-116.
Rescuing Rawls’s Institutionalism and Incentives Inequality.Edward Andrew Greetis - 2019 - Res Publica 25 (4):571-590.
Justice as fairness and bad luck.Robert van der Veen - 2019 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 22 (3):253-268.
‘Perhaps the most important primary good’: self-respect and Rawls’s principles of justice.Nir Eyal - 2005 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 4 (2):195-219.
Rawlsian Stability and the Hazards of Envy.Alexandros Manolatos - 2018 - Public Reason 10 (1).
Putting Incentives in Context: A Reply to Penny.Harrison P. Frye - 2015 - Res Publica 21 (1):93-98.
An Alternative Derivation of the Difference Principle.Nollaig MacKenzie - 1974 - Dialogue 13 (4):787-793.
Envy as a Civic Emotion.Sara Protasi - 2022 - In Thom Brooks (ed.), Political Emotions: Towards a Decent Public Sphere. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Fair Equality of Opportunity.Larry A. Alexander - 1985 - Philosophy Research Archives 11:197-208.
Fair Equality of Opportunity.Larry A. Alexander - 1985 - Philosophy Research Archives 11:197-208.
Granice troski o przyszłe pokolenia.Tomasz Żuradzki - 2010 - Diametros 26:206-225.
Self-Respect and the Justification of Rawlsian Principles of Justice.Pablo Aguayo Westwood - 2021 - Ethics and Social Welfare 15 (3):232-245.
Możliwości czy dobra pierwotne? Dyskusja Amartyi Sena z Johnem Rawlsem na temat właściwej przestrzeni sprawiedliwości.Tomasz Kwarciński - 2006 - Roczniki Filozoficzne 54 (1):81-104.
Społeczeństwo wrażliwe czy społeczeństwo skuteczne? Prawa moralne podmiotów nieosobowych w świetle teorii sprawiedliwości Johna Rawlsa.Adriana Schetz - 2021 - Przeglad Filozoficzny - Nowa Seria:293-302.
The Structure of a Rawlsian Theory of Just Work.Lars Lindblom - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 101 (4):577-599.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-01-24

Downloads
2 (#1,798,685)

6 months
2 (#1,202,576)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Adrian Kuźniar
University of Warsaw

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references