Non-inductive explication of two inductive intuitions

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 34 (3):209-223 (1983)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In section I the notions of logical and inductive probability will be discussed as well as two explicanda, viz. degree of confirmation, the base for inductive probability, and degree of evidential support, Popper's favourite explicandum. In section II it will be argued that Popper's paradox of ideal evidence is no paradox at all; however, it will also be shown that Popper's way out has its own merits

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,296

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A brand new type of inductive logic: Reply to Diderik Batens.Theo A. F. Kuipers - 2005 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 83 (1):248-252.
The Concept of Inductive Probability.Patrick Maher - 2006 - Erkenntnis 65 (2):185-206.
What has science to do with truth?L. Jonathan Cohen - 1980 - Synthese 45 (3):489 - 510.
A Conception of Inductive Logic.Patrick Maher - 2006 - Philosophy of Science 73 (5):513-523.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
14 (#1,020,370)

6 months
133 (#31,570)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

The success theory of confirmation.Theo Af Kuipers - 1999 - Logique Et Analyse 42 (8):447-82.

Add more citations

References found in this work

On the utility of repeating the 'same' experiment.Peter Urbach - 1981 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 59 (2):151 – 162.

Add more references