Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 83 (1):248-252 (2005)
Authors | |
Abstract |
In section I the notions of logical and inductive probability will be discussed as well as two explicanda, viz. degree of confirmation, the base for inductive probability, and degree of evidential support, Popper's favourite explicandum. In section II it will be argued that Popper's paradox of ideal evidence is no paradox at all; however, it will also be shown that Popper's way out has its own merits
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Deductively Definable Logies of Induction.John D. Norton - 2010 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 39 (6):617 - 654.
Non-Inductive Explication of Two Inductive Intuitions.Theo A. F. Kuipers - 1983 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 34 (3):209-223.
Some Estimates of the Optimum Inductive Method.Theo A. F. Kuipers - 1986 - Erkenntnis 24 (1):37 - 46.
Hempel's Conception of Inductive Inference in Inductive-Statistical Explanation.Wesley C. Salmon - 1977 - Philosophy of Science 44 (2):179-185.
Logical Foundations of Evidential Support.Branden Fitelson - 2006 - Philosophy of Science 73 (5):500-512.
A Generalization of Carnap's Inductive Logic.Theo A. F. Kuipers - 1973 - Synthese 25 (3-4):334 - 336.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
42 ( #270,021 of 2,507,714 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,820 of 2,507,714 )
2009-01-28
Total views
42 ( #270,021 of 2,507,714 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,820 of 2,507,714 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads