Pride and Prejudice or Family and Flirtation?: Jane Austen's Depiction of Women's Mating Strategies

Philosophy and Literature 38 (1):114-128 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In The Art Instinct, Denis Dutton promoted a theoretical framework that “has more validity, more power, and more possibilities than the hermetic discourse that deadens so much of the humanities.”1 This framework is Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution by natural and sexual selection. Dutton proposed to seek “human universals that underlie the vast cacophony of cultural differences and across the globe” (AI, p. 39), based on a shared, evolved human nature.This contrasts with the relativistic presumptions of those falling under the shadow of Margaret Mead and Clifford Geertz, or “the dogmas of Freud, the speculations of Jung, the sterile formulations of behaviorism, all variously empty or misleading” (p. 37). Also ..

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The virtue of pride: Jane Austen as moralist. [REVIEW]Theodore M. Benditt - 2003 - Journal of Value Inquiry 37 (2):245-257.
Birth order and relationships.Catherine Salmon - 2003 - Human Nature 14 (1):73-88.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-11-14

Downloads
30 (#531,625)

6 months
10 (#265,304)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Daniel J. Kruger
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references