A comprehensive theory of human mating must explain between-sex and within-sex differences in mating strategies

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):593-594 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Gangestad & Simpson make a major contribution by highlighting the importance of mate choice for good genes, the costs of alternative strategies, and tradeoffs inherent in human mating. By downplaying sex differences and ignoring the nongenetic adaptive benefits of short term mating, however, they undermine their goal of “strategic pluralism” by presenting a theory devoid of many documented complexities of human mating.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 86,592

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
68 (#205,800)

6 months
1 (#873,176)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The Morning after the Night Before.Anne Campbell - 2008 - Human Nature 19 (2):157-173.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references