Correction to: Reply to Cartwright, Pemberton, Wieten: “mechanisms, laws and explanation”

European Journal for Philosophy of Science 11 (3):1-2 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A Correction to this paper has been published (changed to open access)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/s13194-021-00396-z

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 97,297

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Reply to Cartwright, Pemberton, Wieten: “mechanisms, laws and explanation”.Beate Krickel - 2020 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 10 (3):1-9.
How the laws of physics don't even fib.A. David Kline & Carl A. Matheson - 1986 - Psa 1986:33--41.
Nancy Cartwright on scientific laws and scientific explanation.I. Hanzel - 1999 - Filozofia 54 (10):717-730.
Cartwright on explanation and idealization.Mehmet Elgin & Elliott Sober - 2002 - Erkenntnis 57 (3):441 - 450.
Nancy Cartwright and Leszek Nowak on Scientific Laws and Scientific Explanation.Igor Hanzel - 2005 - In Jan Faye, Paul Needham, Uwe Scheffler & Max Urchs (eds.), Nature's Principles. Springer. pp. 103--135.
Mechanisms, laws and explanation.Nancy Cartwright, John Pemberton & Sarah Wieten - 2020 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 10 (3):1-19.
Capacities, explanation and the possibility of disunity.Jakob Hohwy - 2003 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17 (2):179 – 190.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-08-12

Downloads
46 (#376,223)

6 months
10 (#592,147)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Beate Krickel
Technische Universität Berlin

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references