“The Most Philosophically Important of All the Sciences”: Karl Popper and Physical Cosmology

Perspectives on Science 21 (3):325-357 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

While Karl Popper’s philosophy of science has only few followers among modern philosophers, it is easily the view of science with the biggest impact on practicing scientists. According to Peter Medawar, Nobel laureate and eminent physiologist, Popper was the greatest authority ever on the scientific method. He praised the “great strength of Karl Popper’s conception of the scientific process,” a main reason for the praise being “that it is realistic—it gives a pretty fair picture of what goes on in real life laboratories” (Medawar 1990, p. 100). Either explicitly or (more often) implicitly, many scientists subscribe to some version of simplified Popperianism, usually by adopting the demarcation criterion that a ..

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The use and abuse of sir Karl Popper.David L. Hull - 1999 - Biology and Philosophy 14 (4):481-504.
Popper's paradoxical pursuit of natural philosophy.Nicholas Maxwell - 2016 - In J. Shearmur & G. Stokes (eds.), Cambridge Companion to Popper. Cambridge University Press. pp. 170-207.
Karl Raimund Popper.Nicholas Maxwell - 2002 - In Leemon McHenry, P. Dematteis & P. Fosl (eds.), British Philosophers, 1800-2000. Bruccoli Clark Layman. pp. 176-194.
Popper's Account of Scientific Method.John Arthur Passmore - 1960 - Philosophy 35 (135):326 - 331.
Karl Popper.Philip Parvin - 2010 - New York: Continuum.
Karl Popper's political philosophy of social science.Geoff Stokes - 1997 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 27 (1):56-79.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-08-22

Downloads
65 (#243,968)

6 months
12 (#203,353)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Methodological reflections on the MOND/dark matter debate.Patrick M. Duerr & William J. Wolf - 2023 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 101 (C):1-23.
Popper: Critical Rationalist, Conventionalist, and Virtue Epistemologist.Patrick M. Duerr - 2023 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 13 (1):54-90.
Karl Popper's forgotten role in the quantum debate at the edge between philosophy and physics in 1950s and 1960s.Flavio Del Santo - 2019 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 67:78-88.
Logical Maximalism in the Empirical Sciences.Constantin C. Brîncuș - 2021 - In Parusniková Zuzana & Merritt David (eds.), Karl Popper's Science and Philosophy. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. pp. 171-184.

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Cosmology.H. Bondi - 1954 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 4 (16):350-352.
Uniformitarianism in cosmology: Background and philosophical implications of the steady-state theory.Yuri Balashov - 1994 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 25 (6):933-958.
Falsification and Demarcation in Astronomy and Cosmology.Benjamin Sovacool - 2005 - Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 25 (1):53-62.
On the impossibility of an infinite past.G. J. Whitrow - 1978 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 29 (1):39-45.

View all 24 references / Add more references