Scientific styles, plain truth, and truthfulness

South African Journal of Philosophy 37 (3):361-378 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Ian Hacking defines a “style of scientific thinking” loosely as a “way to find things out about the world” characterised by five hallmark features of a number of scientific template styles. Most prominently, these are autonomy and “self-authentication”: a scientific style of thinking, according to Hacking, is not good because it helps us find out the truth in some domain, it itself defines the criteria for truth-telling in its domain. I argue that Renaissance medicine, Mediaeval “demonology”, and magical thinking pass muster as scientific according to Hacking's criteria. However, application of these thought styles to the entities they introduce generates statements that logically imply a set of “ordinary” statements—or what Bernard Williams calls “plain truths”—which, contra the claims of autonomy and self-authentication, allows styles to be assessed from a style- independent perspective. Using Williams’ notion of plain truth, I show that Renaissance medicine, demonology, and magical thinking, in reality issue in many plain falsehoods. This confronts us with what I call Hacking's dilemma: either define stricter necessary conditions on being a style of scientific thinking, or concede that some styles albeit scientific are not as good at finding things out about the world as others. I make three suggestions to deal with the dilemma.

Similar books and articles

Truth and truthfulness attributions.Paolo Casalegno - 2005 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 105 (3):295–320.
‘Language, Truth and Reason’ 30years later.Ian Hacking - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 43 (4):599-609.
Williams on truthfulness.ByCatherine Z. Elgin - 2005 - Philosophical Quarterly 55 (219):343–352.
Understanding Truth in Health Communication.Seow Ting Lee - 2011 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 26 (4):263-282.
The Word of God and the Language of Man.Michael Clark - 1978 - Semiotic Scene 2 (2):61-90.
Truthfulness and Business.Lubomira Radoilska - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 79 (1-2):21 - 28.


Added to PP

345 (#51,530)

6 months
132 (#20,919)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Robert Kowalenko
University of Witwatersrand

Citations of this work

Filsafat Ilmu - Edisi 2.Endry Boeriswati & Fernandes Arung - 2019 - Tangerang, Tangerang City, Banten, Indonesia: Penerbit Universitas Terbuka.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Word and Object.Willard Van Orman Quine - 1960 - Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
Philosophical Investigations.Ludwig Wittgenstein - 1953 - New York, NY, USA: Wiley-Blackwell. Edited by G. E. M. Anscombe.
Two Dogmas of Empiricism.W. Quine - 1951 - [Longmans, Green].
Two Dogmas of Empiricism.Willard V. O. Quine - 1951 - Philosophical Review 60 (1):20–43.

View all 36 references / Add more references