Science Sexist?

Social Philosophy Today 2:147-157 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

15434044

DOI

10.5840/socphiltoday1989221

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

How Many Feminists Does It Take to Make A Joke? Sexist Humor and What's Wrong with It.Merrie Bergmann - 1986 - Hypatia 1 (1):63 - 82.
Romantic Love.Carol Caraway - 1987 - Philosophy and Theology 2 (1):76-96.
Romantic Love.Carol Caraway - 1987 - Philosophy and Theology 1 (4):361-368.
A successor to the realism/antirealism question.Janet A. Kourany - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (3):101.
Book reviews : Is science sexist? And other problems in the biomedical sciences. By Michael Ruse. Dordrecht and boston: Reidel, 1981. Pp. XIX + 299. Hardback, U.s. $42; paperback, U.s. $14.95. [REVIEW]Richard Burian - 1985 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 15 (1):111-114.
Humor, Context, and Divided Cognition.Lawrence Lengbeyer - 2005 - Social Theory and Practice 31 (3):309-336.
The source and status of values for socially responsible science.Matthew J. Brown - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 163 (1):67-76.
Is Science Sexist? And Other Problems in the Biological Sciences Michael Ruse Western Ontario Series, Vol. 17 Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel, 1981. Pp. xii, 299. Cloth $42.00 ; Paper $14.95 , Pallas Paperback Series 18. [REVIEW]Anne Minas - 1983 - Dialogue 22 (1):183-184.
Rehabilitating neutrality.Hugh Lacey - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 163 (1):77-83.
A philosophy of science for the twenty‐first century.Janet A. Kourany - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (1):1-14.
Philosophy of Science After Feminism.Janet A. Kourany - 2010 - , US: Oxford University Press.
The Extinction of Masculine Generics.Brian D. Earp - 2012 - Journal for Communication and Culture 2 (1):4-19.
Comments on Philosophy of Science after Feminism, by Janet Kourany.John Dupré - 2012 - Perspectives on Science 20 (3):310-319.
Sexist Language. [REVIEW]Debra Aidun - 1982 - Teaching Philosophy 5 (3):265-267.
How Sexist Is Sartre?Bonnie Burstow - 1992 - Philosophy and Literature 16 (1):32-48.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-02

Downloads
19 (#797,374)

6 months
5 (#632,816)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Janet Kourany
University of Notre Dame

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references