Anthropocentrism versus Ecocentrism Revisited: Theoretical Confusions and Practical Conclusions

SATS 14 (1):21-37 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

One of the hardest questions in environmental philosophy is the debate between anthropocentric and ecocentric accounts of value. I argue that a great deal of the disagreement in this debate arises from a) misunderstanding of the concepts used in the debate and b) unfruitful reading of vaguely framed arguments. The conceptual and argumentative analysis of the debate shows that many arguments can be ignored as they either contain conceptual confusion or concern issues that are actually irrelevant to the centrism division. However, there are arguments that maintain their relevance, and these arguments have important consequences on the practical environmental ethics. Hence, contrary to Bryan G. Norton’s optimism about the “centrism convergence” on the level of practical environmentalism, I contend that disagreements prevail even in practice. As a solution, I suggest that the centrism debaters should focus on the practical level and work to find space for agreement.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,221

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Toward a weak anthropocentrism.Stephen H. Webb - 2014 - Zygon 49 (3):761-763.
Anthropocentrism: A Misunderstood Problem.Tim Hayward - 1997 - Environmental Values 6 (1):49 - 63.
Ecocentrism as anthropocentrism.Martin Drenthen - 2011 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 14 (2):151 - 154.
Reason and experience.Kurt Baier - 1973 - Noûs 7 (1):56-67.
On being human.Robin Attfield - 1974 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 17 (1-4):175 – 192.
A Typology of Corporate Environmental Policies.Michel Dion - 1998 - Environmental Ethics 20 (2):151-162.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-18

Downloads
62 (#233,420)

6 months
11 (#127,802)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Teea Kortetmäki
University of Jyväskylä

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan - 2004 - Univ of California Press.
The case for animal rights.Tom Regan - 2009 - In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Noûs. Oxford University Press. pp. 425-434.
The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan & Mary Midgley - 1986 - The Personalist Forum 2 (1):67-71.
The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan - 1985 - Human Studies 8 (4):389-392.

View all 35 references / Add more references