The pecking order: social hierarchy as a philosophical problem

Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Our political thinking is driven, far more than philosophers recognize, by a concern for social equality and, more specifically, a concern to avoid relations of inferiority. Niko Kolodny argues that, in order to make sense of the most familiar ideas in our political thought and discourse - the justification of the state, democracy, and rule of law, as well as objections to paternalism and corruption - we cannot merely appeal to freedom (as libertarians like Nozick do) or to distributive fairness (as liberals like Rawls do). We must, instead, appeal directly to claims against inferiority, that no one stands above or below.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-11-19

Downloads
44 (#372,384)

6 months
14 (#200,872)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Niko Kolodny
University of California, Berkeley

Citations of this work

Political legitimacy.Fabienne Peter - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Utilitarianism and the Social Nature of Persons.Nikhil Venkatesh - 2023 - Dissertation, University College London
Unjust Equal Relations.Andreas Bengtson - forthcoming - Economics and Philosophy:1-21.
The Distinctiveness of Relational Equality.Devon Cass - 2024 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics.
The demos of the democratic firm.Iñigo González-Ricoy & Pablo Magaña - forthcoming - Politics, Philosophy and Economics.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references