Engineering Ethics: Balancing Cost, Schedule, and Risk--Lessons Learned from the Space Shuttle. Rosa Lynn B. Pinkus, Larry J. Shuman, Norman P. Hummon, Harvey WolfeThe Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture, and Deviance at NASA. Diane Vaughan [Book Review]

, &
Isis 89 (4):761-763 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1086/384221

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,897

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Engineering Ethics: Balancing Cost, Schedule, and Risk--Lessons Learned from the Space Shuttle by Rosa Lynn B. Pinkus; Larry J. Shuman; Norman P. Hummon; Harvey Wolfe; The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture, and Deviance at NASA by Diane Vaughan. [REVIEW]Ronald Kline, William Lynch & Jameson Wetmore - 1998 - Isis 89:761-763.
Engineering ethics: balancing cost, schedule, and risk--lessons learned from the space shuttle.Rosa Lynn B. Pinkus (ed.) - 1997 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
From Challenger to Columbia.Junichi Murata - 2006 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 10 (1):30-44.
Representation and misrepresentation: Tufte and the Morton thiokol engineers on the Challenger.Wade Robison - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (1):59-81.
Second-Guessing Scientists and Engineers: Post Hoc Criticism and the Reform of Practice in Green Chemistry and Engineering.William T. Lynch - 2015 - Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (5):1217-1240.
Engineers and management: The challenge of the Challenger incident. [REVIEW]Patricia H. Werhane - 1991 - Journal of Business Ethics 10 (8):605 - 616.
Validity and Reliability of an Instrument for Assessing Case Analyses in Bioengineering Ethics Education.Ilya M. Goldin, Rosa Lynn Pinkus & Kevin Ashley - 2015 - Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (3):789-807.
Implicit knowledge in engineering judgment and scientific reasoning.Michael E. Gorman - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):767-768.
Teaching Engineering Ethics using BLOCKS Game.Shiew Wei Lau, Terence Peng Lian Tan & Suk Meng Goh - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (3):1357-1373.
Individual and couple decision behavior under risk: evidence on the dynamics of power balance. [REVIEW]André de Palma, Nathalie Picard & Anthony Ziegelmeyer - 2011 - Theory and Decision 70 (1):45-64.
Introduction: Science, Technology and Human Rights: Lessons Learned from the Right to Water and Sanitation.Jessica M. Wyndham & Theresa Harris - 2014 - Science and Engineering Ethics 20 (4):827-831.
Economics, Risk-Cost-Benefit Analysis, and the Linearity Assumption.K. S. Shrader-Frechette - 1982 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:217 - 232.
Philosophy of technology and macro-ethics in engineering.Wha-Chul Son - 2008 - Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (3):405-415.
Better communication between engineers and managers: Some ways to prevent many ethically hard choices.Michael Davis - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (2):171-212.
Culture and engineering in the USA and Japan.Leonard H. Lynn - 2003 - AI and Society 17 (3-4):241-255.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
36 (#443,637)

6 months
4 (#790,394)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references