Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (2):171-212 (1997)

Authors
Michael Davis
Illinois Institute of Technology
Abstract
This article is concerned with ways better communication between engineers and their managers might help prevent engineers being faced with some of the ethical problems that make up the typical course in engineering ethics. Beginning with observations concerning the Challenger disaster, the article moves on to report results of empirical research on the way technical communication breaks down, or doesn’t break down, between engineers and managers. The article concludes with nine recommendations for organizational change to help prevent communications breakdown.
Keywords ethics  organizations  disaster  Challenger  managers  technology
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11948-997-0008-4
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,066
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Explaining Wrongdoing.Michael Davis - 1989 - Journal of Social Philosophy 20 (1-2):74-90.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Is There a Profession of Engineering?Michael Davis - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (4):407-428.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
35 ( #322,886 of 2,498,784 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #421,542 of 2,498,784 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes