Tracking hesitations may represent a single-Channel limit in response programming

Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 25 (5):343-343 (1987)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,745

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Negative S− contrast with minimal response requirements in S+.Stephen Werk & James H. McHose - 1975 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 5 (1):25-27.
A within-S test of the response specificity of the PRE.A. Grant Young, P. A. Hale & G. D. Fuselier - 1974 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 3 (6):437-439.
Motor programming of keystrokes under varying response conditions.Pa Mullins - 1992 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 30 (6):455-455.
S. S. Stevens: The psychophysicist.Clifford T. Morgan - 1975 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 6 (3):234-237.
Slower movement times may not necessarily imply online programming.Mg Fischman & Tg Reeve - 1990 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 28 (6):513-513.
A test for S-S associations in a conditional counting task.Richard A. Burns & Frances A. Nesbitt - 1990 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 28 (5):441-444.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-04-06

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references