Governance, expertise, and the ‘culture of care’: The changing constitutions of laboratory animal research in Britain, 1876–2000
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 93:107-122 (2022)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Responsibility and Laboratory Animal Research Governance.Sarah Hartley & Carmen McLeod - 2018 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 43 (4):723-741.
Are smelly animals happy animals? Competing definitions of laboratory animal cruelty and public policy.Julian McAllister Groves - 1994 - Society and Animals 2 (2):125-144.
Are Smelly Animals Happy Animals? Competing Definitions of Laboratory Animal Cruelty and Public Policy.Julian M. Sosc Groves - 1994 - Society and Animals 2 (2):125-144.
Locating the ‘culture wars’ in laboratory animal research: national constitutions and global competition.Gail Davies - 2021 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 89:177-187.
Science, Culture, and Care in Laboratory Animal Research: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on the History and Future of the 3Rs.Robert G. W. Kirk, Pru Hobson-West, Beth Greenhough & Gail Davies - 2018 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 43 (4):603-621.
Role of the institutional animal care and use committee in monitoring research.Nicholas H. Steneck - 1997 - Ethics and Behavior 7 (2):173 – 184.
Clinical Laboratory Science in the Changing Scene of Health Care: Proceedings of the Sixth Eccls Seminar Held at Cologne, West Germany, 8th–10th May, 1985. [REVIEW]J. P. Ashby - 1987 - Springer.
Quasi-Science and the State: 'Governing Science' in Comparative Perspective.Stephen Turner - 2017 - In Nico Stehr (ed.), The Governance of Knowledge. New York, USA: Routledge.
'Wanted—standard guinea pigs': Standardisation and the experimental animal market in Britain ca. 1919–1947.Robert G. W. Kirk - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 39 (3):280-291.
Expertise in research ethics: Is there any such thing?Lynn Gillam - 2004 - Monash Bioethics Review 23 (3):58-64.
Institutional animal care and use committees: A flawed paradigm or work in progress?John P. Gluck & F. Barbara Orlans - 1997 - Ethics and Behavior 7 (4):329 – 336.
Philosophical and Psychological Accounts of Expertise and Experts.Matt Stichter - 2015 - Humana Mente 8 (28).
Is Ethical Expertise Possible?Jukka Varelius - 2008 - Medicine Health Care and Philosophy 11 (2):127-132.
Expertise and Expert Knowledge in Social and Procedural Entanglement.Marek Hetmański - 2020 - Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture 4 (2):6-22.
Analytics
Added to PP
2022-04-08
Downloads
8 (#988,598)
6 months
2 (#298,943)
2022-04-08
Downloads
8 (#988,598)
6 months
2 (#298,943)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
References found in this work
Containing the Atom: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and Nuclear Power in the United States and South Korea.Sheila Jasanoff & Sang-Hyun Kim - 2009 - Minerva 47 (2):119-146.
Recovering The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique: The 3Rs and the Human Essence of Animal Research.Robert G. W. Kirk - 2018 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 43 (4):622-648.
A Brave New Animal For A Brave New World: The British Laboratory Animals Bureau And The Constitution Of International Standards Of Laboratory Animal Production And Use, Circa 1947–1968.Robert Kirk - 2010 - Isis 101:62-94.
Science, Culture, and Care in Laboratory Animal Research: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on the History and Future of the 3Rs.Robert G. W. Kirk, Pru Hobson-West, Beth Greenhough & Gail Davies - 2018 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 43 (4):603-621.
'Wanted—standard guinea pigs': Standardisation and the experimental animal market in Britain ca. 1919–1947.Robert G. W. Kirk - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 39 (3):280-291.
