'Wanted—standard guinea pigs': Standardisation and the experimental animal market in Britain ca. 1919–1947

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 39 (3):280-291 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In 1942 a coalition of twenty scientific societies formed the Conference on the Supply of Experimental Animals in an attempt to pressure the Medical Research Council to accept responsibility for the provision of standardised experimental animals in Britain. The practice of animal experimentation was subject to State regulation under the Cruelty to Animals Act of 1876, but no provision existed for the provision of animals for experimental use. Consequently, day-to-day laboratory work was reliant on a commercial small animal market which had emerged to sustain the hobby of animal fancying. This paper explores how difficulties encountered in experimental practice within the laboratory led to the problematisation of biomedical science’s reliance upon a commercial market for animals during the inter-war period. This is shown to have produced a crisis within animal reliant experimental science in the early 1940s which enabled the left-wing Association of Scientific Workers to cast science’s reliance on a free market as economically inefficient and a threat to the reliability of British research. It is argued that the development of standard experimental animals in Britain was, therefore, embedded within the wider cultural, societal, political and economic national context of the time.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On guinea pigs, dogs and men: Anaphylaxis and the study of biological individuality, 1902-1939.Ilana Löwy - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 34 (3):399-423.
Remember Saddam's Human Guinea Pigs.Jonathan D. Moreno - 2003 - American Journal of Bioethics 3 (3):53-53.
Slash writers and guinea pigs as models for a scientific multiliteracy.Matthew Weinstein - 2006 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 38 (5):607–623.
Popular media and animals.Claire Molloy - 2011 - New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Preferences, beliefs, and heuristics.Toshio Yamagishi - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (6):836-837.
Communication as Commodity: Should the Media be on the Market?Rutger Claassen - 2010 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 28 (1):65-79.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
44 (#352,984)

6 months
5 (#629,136)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Dogs for Life: Beagles, Drugs, and Capital in the Twentieth Century.Brad Bolman - 2022 - Journal of the History of Biology 55 (1):147-179.
The demand for pregnancy testing: The Aschheim–Zondek reaction, diagnostic versatility, and laboratory services in 1930s Britain.Jesse Olszynko-Gryn - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 47:233-247.
Mobilizing Experimental Life: Spaces of Becoming with Mutant Mice.Gail Davies - 2013 - Theory, Culture and Society 30 (7-8):129-153.
Unfolding epidemiological stories: How the WHO made frozen blood into a flexible resource for the future.Joanna Radin - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 47 (PA):62-73.
It is what it eats: Chemically defined media and the history of surrounds.Hannah Landecker - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 57:148-160.

View all 14 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Brave new world. Huxley - 2006 - In Thomas L. Cooksey (ed.), Masterpieces of Philosophical Literature. Greenwood Press.

Add more references