Review of Léna Soler, Emiliano Trizio, and Andrew Pickering, eds. Science as It Could Have Been. Discussing the Contingency/Inevitability Problem. Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press, 2016. [Book Review]

Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 6 (2):319-323 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1086/687597

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Other histories, other sciences.Kidd Ian James - 2017 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 61:57-60.
Léna Soler, Emiliano Trizio and Andrew Pickering , Science as It Could Have Been: Discussing the Contingency/Inevitability Problem. Pittsburgh: The University of Pittsburgh Press, 2015. Pp. 462. ISBN 978-0-8229-4445-4. $61.95. [REVIEW]Alex Aylward - 2017 - British Journal for the History of Science 50 (2):379-381.
A Paean to Contingency: Léna Soler, Emiliano Trizio, and Andrew Pickering : Science As It Could Have Been: Discussing the Contingency/Inevitability Problem. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburg Press, 2015, x+462pp, $61.95 HB. [REVIEW]Joseph D. Martin - 2016 - Metascience 25 (3):437-441.
Michel Bourdeau, Mary Pickering, and Warren Schmaus, eds. Love, Order, and Progress: The Science, Philosophy, and Politics of Auguste Comte. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2018. Pp. xiv+402. $49.95 . ISBN 0-8229-4522-3. [REVIEW]Trevor Pearce - 2019 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 9 (2):419-423.
Robustness, solidity, and multiple determinations: Léna Soler, Emiliano Trizio, Thomas Nickles and William Wimsatt (eds): Characterizing the robustness of science: After the practice turn in philosophy of science. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, vol. 292. Dordrecht: Springer, 2012, 372pp, €149.75 HB. [REVIEW]Klodian Coko & Jutta Schickore - 2013 - Metascience 22 (3):681-683.
Daniela Bailer-Jones. Scientific Models in Philosophy of Science. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2009. Pp. 248. $45.95. [REVIEW]S. G. Sterrett - 2013 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 3 (2):334-337.
Chunglin Kwa. Styles of Knowing: A New History of Science from Ancient Times to the Present. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2011. Pp. viii+366. $27.95. [REVIEW]Elay Schech - 2014 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 4 (1):161-165.
Allan Franklin. Shifting Standards: Experiments in Particle Physics in the Twentieth Century. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2013. Pp. 360. $50.00. [REVIEW]Kent Staley & Heraclio Tavares - 2016 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 6 (1):158-162.
Aristides Baltas. Peeling Potatoes or Grinding Lenses: Spinoza and Young Wittgenstein Converse on Immanence and Its Logic. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2012. Pp. vii+290. $65.00. [REVIEW]Jim Bogen - 2013 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 3 (2):352-356.
Embracing quantitative methods in history and philosophy of science: Grant Ramsey and Andreas de Block (eds.): The dynamics of science: computational frontiers in history and philosophy of science. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2022, 308 pp, $60.00 HB. [REVIEW]Eugenio Petrovich - 2023 - Metascience 32 (3):317-320.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-01-27

Downloads
72 (#79,783)

6 months
200 (#100,946)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Katherina Kinzel
Utrecht University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references