The paradigm case of power as ?power over? (not ?power to') betrays a concern (1) more with the capacity to dominate others than with the unqualified capacity to act as such; (2) more with the fact, than with the morality, of dominance ? underscoring the key analytical distinction between ?power? and ?authority'; and (3) more with compulsion than co?operation. The three moves to combine (1) ?power over? with ?power to?, (2) ?power? with ?authority?, and (3) ?power? with ?co?operation?, are all seen as inflationary, diminishing the value of the paradigm case, and assisting in rendering power, in its actual operations, both more obscure and insidious. Tumbling down this slope, there is a further argument, to the same effect, but secured by deflating, rather than inflating, the paradigm case. This deflationary argument (4) views luck as an alternative to power. In a world of dizzying technological innovation, marked by a deepening gap between rich and poor in the cities, between advanced and dependent states, we confront an inclination in many quarters both to expand and to contract power, so that it is everything and everywhere, thus nothing and nowhere. In attempts to substitute luck for power, it becomes difficult to assign to power responsibility, as heretofore. This paper is the first of two parts, taking a critical look at the overwhelming of power by inflation. The second part of this paper will be published in a subsequent issue, and it critically inspects the argument for deflation
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/13698239808403227
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,489
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Leviathan.Thomas Hobbes - 2006 - In Aloysius Martinich, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Early Modern Philosophy: Essential Readings with Commentary. Blackwell.
Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action.David M. Rasmussen - 1993 - Philosophical Quarterly 43 (173):571.

View all 21 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

A Non-Normative Theory of Power and Domination.Pamela Pansardi - 2013 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 16 (5):1-20.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Liberty as Power.Preston King - 1999 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 2 (3):1-25.
Power and Moral Responsibility.Thomas Pink - 2009 - Philosophical Explorations 12 (2):127 – 149.
Democracy and the Persistence of Power.Preston King - 1998 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 1 (4):93-112.
A Global Tradition? Power and Historicity.Krzysztof Ziarek - 2004 - Research in Phenomenology 34 (1):103-120.
Power: A Philosophical Analysis.Peter Morriss - 1989 - Manchester University Press.
Capitalists Rule Ok? Some Puzzles About Power.Brian Barry - 2002 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 1 (2):155-184.
Rethinking Power.Amy Allen - 1998 - Hypatia 13 (1):21 - 40.
Hannah Arendt on Power.Garrath Williams - 2011 - In Keith Dowding (ed.), Encyclopedia of Power. Thousand Oaks: Sage. pp. 26-28.
Balance of Power and the Problem of Perception.Johan Galtung - 1964 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 7 (1-4):277 – 294.
Possessive Power.Janet Farrell Smith - 1986 - Hypatia 1 (2):103 - 120.
A Defense of Statistical Power Analysis.Brian R. Lashley - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):209-210.


Added to PP index

Total views
20 ( #560,772 of 2,520,837 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #405,623 of 2,520,837 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes