A defense of statistical power analysis

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):209-210 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Chow attacks statistical power analysis on theoretical grounds. I argue that if significance testing is defensible, so is power analysis. A number of Chow's criticisms seem to suggest that power analysts are confused about certain fundamental issues. I claim that few power analysts make the mistakes Chow describes. Finally, I address Chow's claim that power analysis is irrelevant to NHSTP because it deals with a different issue.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Power: A Philosophical Analysis.Peter Morriss - 1987 - New York: Manchester University Press.
The Null-hypothesis significance-test procedure is still warranted.Siu L. Chow - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):228-235.
The logic of Null hypothesis testing.Edward Erwin - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):197-198.
Costs and benefits of statistical significance tests.Michael G. Shafto - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):218-219.
Balance of power and the problem of perception.Johan Galtung - 1964 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 7 (1-4):277 – 294.
Capitalists rule ok? Some puzzles about power.Brian Barry - 2002 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 1 (2):155-184.
Some problems with Chow's problems with power.Deborah G. Mayo - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):212-213.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
32 (#471,613)

6 months
12 (#174,629)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references