Jacquette on Grelling’s Paradox

Analysis 65 (3):258–260 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This discusses a mistake (concerning what a definition is) in “Grelling’s revenge”, Analysis 64, 251-6 (2004), by Dale Jacquette, who claims that the simple theory of types is inconsistent

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Idealism and Williams's semantic paradox.Dale Jacquette - 2004 - Philosophical Investigations 27 (2):117–128.
Grelling’s Paradox.Jay Newhard - 2005 - Philosophical Studies 126 (1):1 - 27.
On grelling's paradox.Robert L. Martin - 1968 - Philosophical Review 77 (3):321-331.
Burleigh's Paradox.Dale Jacquette - 2007 - Philosophy 82 (3):437-448.
Forrester's Paradox.Dale Jacquette - 1986 - Dialogue 25 (4):761-.
The validity paradox in modal S.Dale Jacquette - 1996 - Synthese 109 (1):47 - 62.
Categories of linguistic aspects and grelling's paradox.Laurence Goldstein - 1980 - Linguistics and Philosophy 4 (3):405 - 421.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
131 (#134,458)

6 months
3 (#857,336)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Syntactical Constraints on Definitions.Dale Jacquette - 2013 - Metaphilosophy 44 (1-2):145-156.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Philosophy of Logics.Susan Haack - 1978 - London and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Philosophy of Logics.Susan Haack - 1978 - Philosophy 56 (217):435-436.
Philosophy of Logics.Susan Haack - 1980 - Mind 89 (354):303-306.
Grelling's revenge.D. Jacquette - 2004 - Analysis 64 (3):251-256.

Add more references