The Importance of Biotic Sovereignty in the Context of Future Changes in the Legal Regulation of Genetically Modified Crops in the European Union and the Republic of Croatia

Filozofska Istrazivanja 42 (2):251-269 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The “Lošinj Declaration on Biotic Sovereignty” is a novelty in the consideration of the environment and life in general and a unique document on a global scale. Until the advent of the Declaration, the environment was usually considered in an instrumentalist way, following the prevailing techno-scientific paradigm. The Declaration introduces biotic sovereignty as the starting point for the debate on GMOs, from which the harmfulness or potential benefits of genetic engineering can be assessed. The protection of biotic sovereignty should be one of the crucial values that European and Croatian citizens should defend in the upcoming struggle to change and probably drastically reduce the regulatory regime for genetically modified crops in the European Union and thus also in Croatia. In this paper, we highlight the importance of the “Lošinj Declaration on Biotic Sovereignty” in the context of the emergence of new gene regulation techniques that are becoming a threat to biotic sovereignty. We analyse the lobbying process against the ruling C-528/16 using the example of the scientists united in the network EU-SAGE. The central part of the paper analyses the controversy over a new European Commission study on new genetic techniques and the political context of the conflict between the European Commission and the European Parliament over the authorisation of new seed varieties of genetically modified crops.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The transatlantic rift in genetically modified food policy.Celina Ramjoué - 2007 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20 (5):419-436.
The problem of national sovereignty and European integration: in search of balance.V. Baranovsjkyj - 2015 - Epistemological studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences 4:46-53.
Time for a New EU Regulatory Framework for GM Crops?Karin Edvardsson Björnberg & Charlotta Zetterberg - 2017 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 30 (3):325-347.
Digital Sovereignty and Identity in the European Union: A Challenge for Building Europe.Sanja Ivic & David Ramiro Troitino - 2022 - European Studies - the Review of European Law, Economics and Politics 9 (2):80-109.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-11-21

Downloads
6 (#1,484,933)

6 months
3 (#1,045,901)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references